| |
Cincinnati Reds fans send a clear message â" deliver the goods
The Cincinnati Reds entertained the St. Louis Cardinals Thursday afternoon at the Great American Ballpark. The Reds completed a critical ten game home stand yesterday that included the four game series with the Cardinals, leading the second place Reds in the National Leagueâs Central division. The Reds have contended since the start of the season for the playoffs, near the first place Cardinals and at or near the top of NL wild card standings.
Despite the Redsâ success on the field, the team hasnât enjoyed a great year at the box office. Before Thursdayâs game the Reds had sold 1,654,728 tickets through 61 home games. The Reds are averaging 27,126 fans per game, filling 64.5 percent of their ballpark. While there are plenty of questions in Cincinnati as to why more people havenât been attending home games, the Reds/Cardinals series did attract more then 160,000 fans.
The Reds realized the series against the Cardinals represented a great opportunity to showcase their team. Monday night (a game the Reds lost 13-1), the Reds offered half-priced tickets in 10 sections and $1 hotdogs, but where still more then 8,000 fans below their stadiumâs capacity. The team offered promotions for each of the four games against the Cardinals in hopes of selling out each game.
The Great American Ballpark, which captures the ambiance of the retro-stadium look, opened in 2003. Built almost entirely with taxpayer dollars, the stadium cost $280 million. 1,855,787 fans made it to Reds games in their last year at Riverfront Stadium (a facility the Reds shared with the NFL Bengals for many years). Baseball fans in the Queen City sent a strong message to Reds management the following year when the Reds moved into their new home.
The Reds drew 2,355,259 fans a significant increase in 2003. However, the team averaged 29,077 fans per game, or filling an average 69.1 percent of their new homeâs seats per game. Teams traditionally enjoy a honeymoon period during the first few years they play in a new facility, selling out most of their home games. That wasnât the case for the Reds. Clearly baseball fans had enough of losing and non-competitive franchises. Attendance dropped and fell moderately in 2004 (2,287,250 28,237 67.1) and even more in 2005 (1,943,157 23,989 57.0)
Carl Lindnerâs stewardship as Reds owner lasted ten years, ten terrible and forgettable seasons of losing and teams that were never competitive or entertaining. Under Linder, the Reds had two wining seasons in the ten he was owner. Robert Castellini, purchased the franchise in January with two other local businessmen.
"Fans are a huge part of the game," right fielder Ryan Freel told The Cincinnati Enquirer. "You don't want to say you get more amped up, but playing in front of 40,000 people is a lot more exciting than playing in front of 5,000 ... it's a lot more intense with a big crowd."
Professional sports teams more so then most other business need to do whatever they can do to reasonably control their message, and in particular whatâs the public believes to be true about that team. While you can never censor the media, making yourself available to answer the mediaâs questions allows a sports franchise to try and spin their message.
The Cincinnati Enquirerâs Colleen Kane tried to contact the Reds about the teamsâ lackluster attendance numbers. Phil Castellini, the Reds senior director of business operations, and chief operating officer John Allen did not return Kaneâs calls. Not only does that encourage the media to speculate if the Reds have a hidden agenda, but it allows the media to draw whatever conclusions they wish to. Avoiding the media also forces writers like Kane to look for other sources prepared to go on the record about that issue, in this case the Reds attendance problems. Kane spoke with a local sports talk show host Lance McAlister of WCKY-AM (1530).
"If being in contention, being the surprise of Major League Baseball, and - if the postseason started today - being in the playoffs isn't enough for a town where baseball was born, I don't know what is," McAlister said. "If I were working for the Reds, I'd throw my hands up."
Many believe the Reds challenge is the class â" what have you done for me. Sports fans everywhere are sending a loud and clear message to sports teams, stand and deliver!
"We appreciate the support we're getting," Freel said. "On the other hand, you wonder if people are still waiting to see if we're going to be in the hunt at the end."
What exactly was Maurice Clarett Thinking?
A life that looked so full of promised three short years ago is today in ruins. Maurice Clarett who may never see the light of day again, is in jail facing a series of weapon related charges. Clarett arrested early Wednesday morning will remain in jail until his trial unable to pay his $5 million bail after the Judge at Clarett's bail hearing ruled the former Ohio State football star was a danger to society.
After being selected as the USA Todayâs 2001 High School Football Player of the Year, a harbinger for what should have been a great career for many years, Clarett entered Ohio State in January 2002. Clarettâs antics should have made people question where his head was very early in the one year he played for the Buckeyes. In October 2002, Clarett told ESPN he would consider leaving Ohio State early for the NFL. Regardless of what the young Clarett was thinking, establishing his intent to leave the Buckeyes early upset many Ohio State football fans.
Despite missing two games in his freshman season to injury, on the field Clarett excelled. Off the field, âissuesâ continued to develop. In December 2002, Clarett was highly critical of Ohio State officials after the 19-year old was upset he was unable to attend a funeral.
Clarett scored the wining touchdown on January 3, 2003, in a 31-24 double-overtime victory over Miami to give Ohio State its first national title in 34 years. While the good times may have been rolling for the Buckeyes and Clarett may have played the key role, TROUBLE was about to surface all around Maurice Clarett and Ohio State. A series of Ohio State related events ended not only Clarettâs Buckeyes career but for all intents and purposes ended his football career.
⢠July 12, 2003 -- The New York Times quotes a teaching assistant at Ohio State who says Clarett got preferential treatment. She says he walked out of a midterm exam but passed the class after the professor gave him an oral exam.
⢠July 29, 2003 -- Ohio State confirms the NCAA is investigating Clarett's claim that more than $10,000 in clothing, CDs, cash and stereo equipment was stolen in April from a 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo that Clarett had borrowed from a local dealership.
⢠Sept. 9, 2003 -- Charged with misdemeanor falsification for the police report on the theft. The charge carries a penalty ranging from probation to six months in jail and $1,000 fine.
⢠Sept. 10, 2003 -- Athletic director Andy Geiger announces Clarett is suspended for the season. Geiger says Clarett received special benefits worth thousands of dollars from a family friend and repeatedly misled investigators.
Clarett then begin a series of lawsuits against the National Football League attempting to circumvent NFL draft eligibility rules. The current NFL collective bargaining agreement dictates once a studentâs junior year has passed he can declare himself for the NFL draft. After the NFLâs successful appeal of a U.S. District Judge in New York ruling that made Clarett eligible for the 20004 NFL draft, Clarett tried twice to have the Supreme Court hear his case. The Court refused to deal with the case both times.
The Denver Broncos wasted a 2005 third round pick on Clarett cutting the running back who hadnât played a football game in more then three years on August 28, 2005.
"He's got some heavy issues," Broncos Coach Mike Shanahan told reporters in Denver Wednesday. "It's just a shame this has happened to a guy that [had] so much promise and so much ability. I'm not sure what happened to him but it's a real shame. . . . We tried to reach him quite a bit when he was here. One thing he did have here was a lot of support from our veterans and our players tried to really take care of this guy and he wanted no part of it, and that was one of the reasons why he didn't make our football team."
His fall from grace continued on January 1, 2006 when Clarett was accused of robbing two people at gunpoint in an alley behind a Columbus bar and is wanted by police on two counts of aggravated robbery. That led to Wednesdayâs terrible events. There has been a great deal of speculation concerning why Clarett was in a vehicle with guns and wearing a bullet proof vest, but one issue has to be certain â" wherever Clarett was headed wasnât to do his good deed of the day.
The question that begs to be asked, what went wrong and why? Clarett graduated from Warren Harding High School in December (2001) of his senior year, reportedly with B-plus grades and a score of 1,220 on his SAT. On the surface Clarett would have appeared to have both the physical and mental stills to become a great athlete and a even better role model. Growing up in Youngstown Ohio, he was a troubled kid who had been in juvenile detention centers three times by the time he was in junior high.
The real challenge society faces in trying to deal with young elite athletes is all too often they are given everything they could want from a very young age. They literally live their lives on pedestal. They almost live their lives in a bubble.
Being told youâre the best from a young age can fill a young personâs mind with the belief that they are above others, and ultimately above the laws that govern our society. An even bigger challenge exists in the media. In the media (and the sports media are very guilty of this) there is a never-ending search for sensationalistic stories, the juicer the better.
Former Florida State running back Warrick Dunn has had an outstanding NFL career that spans more then ten years with first the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and then the Atlanta Falcons. Dunn has rushed for an average of 832 yards per season in his decade long career. As great as heâs been on the football field his accomplishments off the field tell the real tale of the man Warrick Dunn has become. He grew up in a single family home, with not a great deal. He gives back even more then he has received with his Foundationâs slogan --âDedicated to providing opportunities for economically-disadvantaged single parents and children who have demonstrated a commitment to achieve financial independence and stability.â
The problem is as great a story as Dunn has become, the media tends to focus on athletes like Maurice Clarett and letâs remember other then a few games at Ohio State Clarett never accomplished anything but bring shame to everyone around him. Society needs to remember what Maurice Clarett has done but must learn what to do from the actions of men like Warrick Dunn.
More from the sports league that canât shoot straight
Its not too often SBN commits an entire Insider Report to one issue only to see that issue surface with a similar story the following day, especially a sports league as obscure as the American Basketball Association, and even rarer with a teams nickname again causing concern. Thursdayâs Insider in part looked at the Buffalo Silverbacks, one of the newest teams in the lowest rung on professional basketballâs ladder, Joe Newmanâs ABA. In a classic case of âwe canât be making this upâ controversy surrounds the selection process for yet another 2006-07 ABA expansion franchise, this one located in Quebec City.
RĂŠal Bourassa has included a cartoon frog in the team's logo. Just as Silverbacks can be considered offensive to members of the African-American community any direct or indirect reference to the word âfrogâ can be just as derogatory to French Canadians.
âI've heard sometimes, âHi, frog,' or âHi, froggie,' but it has never been an insult to me,â he said from his home in Quebec. âI feel good with the fact that maybe someone will say, âYou are not shy to be a frog.' My answer will be ... âI may be a frog, but I am proud to be a frog.', Bourassa told The Globe and Mail.
In a classic ABA business decision Bourassa purchased the team on March 31, 2004 but waited two years to begin his teamsâ play in the ABA. His one decision just after paying Newmanâs $20,000 expansion fee â" meet with Quebec City based public relations companies in hopes of finding the right name and logo.
âI asked them, may I be not politically correct with my logo and my name? But have something funny?â he said.
Thursday, Liberal MP and former sports minister Denis Coderre added his voice to the chorus, saying the moniker risks glorifying a racist depiction of Francophones.
"I find it degrading, it's not a very judicious choice," said Coderre, who represents the Montreal riding of Bourassa. "To have the entire league refer to the team from Quebec as frogs is not useful. We shouldn't have to go through that. It's the kind of remark we've been fighting against for years."
French-speaking Canadians are acutely sensitive to the derogatory term â" a Montreal La Presse columnist called it "the ultimate insult" â" which etymologists trace back to a British slight of the French fondness for eating frogs as a delicacy.
There are those who believe that as a society we have become too politically sensitive to sports team nicknames. The NCAA may not agree with that statement. The NCAA in what has evolved into a very heated debate has banned all Indian related school nicknames some with âtraditionsâ that date back almost 100 years, to a time in history when schools created nicknames that should have been considered racially insensitive.
As the terrible financial toll owning an ABA team has taken on most would-be owners, the optics and terrible publicity of naming your name and potentially insulting the ticket buying public just makes no sense whatsoever. Soon enough the Buffalo Silverbacks and the Quebec City Jumping Frogs will go the way 23 of the 30 ABA teams that started the 2005-05 season did â" into disarray and bankruptcy.
For Sports Business News this is Howard Bloom. Source cited in this Insider Report: ESPN, Associated Press, Cincinnati Enquirer and the Globe and Mail.
Dave at dl004d The Blog. sent me this article from Wall Street Journal Article by Allen Barra. These are the kind of articles I'd love to write (alas only if I was smarter, and took the time to do research). #2 is especially damning for Buzzsaw fans out there (sorry Will......you'll always have the Pink Taco though). Let's get into these......
P.S.- I dare you to find photo more funny than this one to the left....seriously....try it.
Ten sweeping statements for which there is no statistical defense By ALLEN BARRA August 26, 2006; Page P14
Compared to baseball, pro football analysis is still in the Stone Age. From the opening kickoff in the NFL's first game, Miami against Pittsburgh, on Thursday, Sept. 7, to the two-minute warning of the Super Bowl on Feb. 4, you'll hear announcers making sweeping proclamations for which there is no statistical basis. What's the truth about pro football's top 10 cherished myths? 1. "Offense sells tickets, but defense wins championships." As with most football clichĂŠs, there's no evidence for this one. The Indianapolis Colts led the league in points (430) and lost in the playoffs; but the Chicago Bears allowed the fewest (202), and they lost, too. The previous season, the Colts also led in scoring but then got lost in the playoffs; so did the Pittsburgh Steelers, who gave up the fewest points. NFL champions have almost always been great on both sides of the ball. As football historian T.J. Troupe puts it, the adage should be "Great defense beats great offense -- and vice versa." I think we can safely say that a great defense or great offense can get you to the playoffs, but it can't get you over the top (see: Redskins, Seahawks, Colts, Bucs, etc.) 2. "You need a strong running game." That's the one ex-coaches-turned-TV-color-men love the most. Do the numbers support it? Last year, the Atlanta Falcons led the NFL with 2,546 yards on the ground, 323 more than the Super Bowl champion Steelers. The Falcons finished 8-8. History says if you can play defense and pass well, you can win with average running. In other words, if the Arizona Cardinals don't improve their passing and overall defense, the acquisition of Edgerrin James won't get them any closer to the playoffs. Interesting......I guess that also means that the Colts should be just as good as they were last year (I am so sick of these Manning v. Manning ads).
3. "A turnover is a turnover." But not all turnovers are created equal: Interceptions are usually much more important than fumbles. As Bud Goode, the father of football analysis, maintains, bad teams don't really fumble any more often than good teams, and, on the whole, the odds of recovering any fumble are about 50-50. (Teams that excel in either fewest fumbles lost or most fumbles recovered in one season generally revert to the norm the next.) Interceptions are always indicators of strength and weakness (good teams make them on defense and don't have them on offense). Plus, as Mr. Goode notes, "Interceptions have a far greater chance than fumbles of being returned for touchdowns." See: Cincinnati Bengals- 28 Fumbles Recovered, 31 Ints.
4. "Great teams are built around the kicking game." Last year, the Buffalo Bills and Oakland Raiders tied for the NFL's best punting average, 45.7 yards a shot. Those two combined for nine wins and 23 losses. The Cardinals led the NFL in both field goals (40) and attempts (43) but finished 5-11. In most NFL games, punting and kicking make a difference only if the teams are otherwise evenly matched. As Aaron Schatz, lead author of Pro Football Prospectus 2006, explains, "The strongest teams aren't the ones with clutch kickers, but the ones who don't need them." Wow this guy hates the Buzzsaw. This makes sense though.
5. "The draft creates parity." The NFL's draft of the top college players is touted as creating parity in the league, since the worst teams get to pick first. It does nothing of the sort. Pro football analyst Steve Silverman sees it this way: "[New England's] Bill Belichick has been selecting pearls in the draft even though the Patriots finish at or near the top every season, because he's smart enough to know his team's needs. Good teams are realistic and win because they make smart picks; bad teams stay bad because they don't recognize what they need and who can fill that need." A two-time Super Bowl MVP, quarterback Tom Brady was the 199th overall pick in 2000; wideout David Givens, who is now with the Tennessee Titans and has had a touchdown reception in seven straight playoff games, went 253rd in 2002. See: New York Jets
6. "You have to control the ball." A sacred belief of coaches is that controlling the ball, as reflected in time of possession, is a key to victory. But there's no strong correlation between ball control and winning. Yes, the 13-3 Denver Broncos led the league last season with 32:37, but 6-10 Dallas Cowboys were a close No. 2 at 32:58. The champion Steelers were ninth in TOP, 31:16, while the No. 10 Titans (31:13) were a dismal 4-12. 7. "Dome teams have the advantage." Because some indoor teams, such as the Colts, have high-powered offenses, the myth has developed that domers have a "fast track" to the playoffs. Some domers do profit from playing under a roof. But as Kerry Byrne of the cutting-edge analytical Web site Cold Hard Football Facts notes: "In the history of the NFL, dome teams are 15-45 on the road in postseason play. And the best dome teams don't even do all that well at home in the playoffs -- like the Colts, who were heavily favored at home against the Steelers in the AFC divisional playoff last year and got stuffed." Ouch....apparently he doesn't like the Colts either (that's okay...neither do I)
8. "The pass sets up the run." You hear this one a lot. It's true that a team with a good passer will get a lot of rushing yards, but only because the passer will get more first downs, which in turn creates more rushing opportunities. Having a good quarterback doesn't mean you'll run the ball better, just more often. Last season the Steelers led the league in yards per pass, 8.2, and were just an average running team at 4.0. 9. "Pass completion percentage is a key stat." No, not a key stat. In fact, not particularly important at all. No one, of course, wants to throw an incomplete pass. The point isn't how many passes you complete, but how far downfield the passes go. Put it this way: Would you rather complete three of three passes for nine yards or one of three passes for 10? Of the top five passers in the NFC last year in pass-completion percentage, only one, Seattle's Matt Hasselbeck, played for a winning team (the Seahawks went to the Super Bowl). The other four played for teams that finished a combined 24-40. Only mistake I found in this article. The top five who were actually starters in the regular season were Palmer (67.8%), P. Manning (67.3%), Bulger (66.9%, 8 games), Hasselbeckk (65.5%), and Brees (64.6%).......I'm pretty sure everyone but Bulger played on a winning team
10. "This is the age of the running quarterback." We've been hearing this for the past few seasons, particularly when the Falcons, with their great running quarterback, Michael Vick, are on TV. But there is no proof that having a great runner at the quarterback spot guarantees a winning team. In 2005, the Falcons lead the league in both rushing yardage and yards per run and still finished just 8-8. They won't get any better until Mr. Vick improves his TD-passes-to-interceptions ratio (15-13 last year). I don't really think you hear people say this. I thought it was that the "Running (Black QB) Never wins the Big Game". (Which ultimately I think is true...not because they are black, but because the Coach/Owner thinks they can carry an entire team by themselves. See: McNair, McNabb) Overall that was a pretty good piece, and you are guaranteed to hear those phrases ad nauseum this year. Keep your ears peeled and use these stats to impress your friends.
Denver Broncos Schedule
Other Searched Terms: google ca/search q romo the bill romanowski story
, search yahoo com/search p bill romanowski
, bill romanowski tackles
, mark madden/ bill romanowski
, bill romanowski raider football
, bill romanowski and bill romanowski
, bill romanowski web site
, bill romanowski workout
, bill romanowski movies
, bill romanowski prints
, bill romanowski and steroids
, bill romanowski
,
|
|